Quotation: Abimbola S, Asthana S, Cortes CM, Guinto RR, Jumbam DT, Louskieter L, et al. (2021) Addressing energy asymmetries in international well being: Imperatives within the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS Med 18(4):
Revealed: April 22, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Abimbola et al. That is an open entry article distributed beneath the phrases of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows unrestricted use, distribution, and copy in any medium, supplied the unique writer and supply are credited.
Funding: The authors acquired no particular funding for this work.
Competing pursuits: I’ve learn the journal’s coverage and the authors of this manuscript have the next competing pursuits: MP serves on the editorial board of PLoS Medication. Not one of the different authors have competing pursuits to reveal.
Coronavirus Illness 2019; HIC,
high-income nation; LMIC,
low- and middle-income nation
- The Coronavirus Illness 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Black Lives Matter and Girls in International Well being actions, and ongoing calls to decolonise international well being have all created house for uncomfortable however vital conversations that reveal severe asymmetries of energy and privilege that permeate all elements of world well being.
- On this article, we, a various, gender-balanced group of public (international) well being researchers and practitioners (most at the moment residing within the so-called international South), define what we see as imperatives for change in a post-pandemic world.
- On the particular person stage (together with and particularly ourselves), we emphasise the necessity to emancipate and decolonise our personal minds (from the colonial conditionings of our schooling), straddle and use our privilege responsibly (to empower others and keep away from elite seize), and construct “Southern” networks (to affirm our possession of world well being).
- On the organisational stage, we name for international well being organisations to follow actual variety and inclusion (in ways in which transcend the beauty), to localise their funding choices (with individuals on the bottom within the driving seat), and to progressively self-decentralise (and so, divest themselves of monetary, epistemic, and political energy).
- And at each the person and organisational stage, we emphasise the necessity to maintain ourselves, our governments, and international well being organisations accountable to those objectives, and particularly for governance constructions and processes that mirror a dedication to actual change.
- By placing a highlight on coloniality and current inequalities, the COVID-19 pandemic evokes requires a extra equitable world and for a decolonised and decentralised method to international well being analysis and follow, one which strikes past tokenistic field ticking about variety and inclusion into actual and accountable commitments to transformative change.
The Coronavirus Illness 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Black Lives Matter motion, and the rising calls to decolonise and handle stories of structural racism inside humanitarian, improvement, worldwide help, and international well being businesses are opening doorways for uncomfortable however vital conversations [1–14]. They’re revealing severe asymmetries of energy and privilege (Fig 1) that permeate all elements of world well being.
Fig 1. International well being, as at the moment practiced, has many asymmetries in energy and privilege.
Coloniality is however one manifestation of supremacy. Subsequently, undoing supremacy would require far more than decolonisation. Picture supply: Madhukar Pai, with paintings by Sophie Lane.
These conversations are taking place in lots of settings, and it’s clear by now that they can’t be brushed away. They’ve elevated, as expressed in numerous editorials, research, conferences, and webinars. Even earlier than the COVID-19 pandemic, there was important however underappreciated discontent amongst public (international) well being practitioners in low- and middle-income nations (LMICs) over the discriminatory actions by funding businesses, universities, and people from high-income nations (HICs).
Nevertheless, COVID-19 has put a highlight on current inequalities and on processes of coloniality (thoughts, physique, data, and energy). It has created situations for additional inequities, with rising populist nationalism and isolationism, widening revenue disparities, and fractured programs of world cooperation [15,16]. The pandemic continues to allow these with cash and energy to increase their affect—making decoloniality, solidarity, and distribution of energy, data, and assets (e.g., vaccines) much more pressing. The truth that HICs have reserved sufficient COVID-19 vaccine doses to vaccinate their very own inhabitants a number of instances over is a stark indication of energy asymmetry in international well being .
Greater than an deadlock or a easy opposition inside the sector, the true considerations round coloniality and energy and privilege maintain the potential to reorient the sphere, within the context of deep uncertainty created by, amongst different large-scale disruptive processes, the COVID-19 disaster. The impacts of pandemics are unpredictable, and former country-level epidemic-preparedness indicators have proved insufficient , based mostly on defective assumptions slightly than a nuanced understanding of native strengths and weaknesses which may solely be understood from the underside up, and with no supremacist lens on the world [1,7].
On this article, we, a various, gender-balanced group of 13 public (international) well being researchers, academics, and practitioners (all born in, and 11 of 13 at the moment residing within the so-called international South), define our want record for change in a post-pandemic world—on the particular person (together with amongst ourselves), and on the organisational stage. Most of us are researchers. Our views, due to this fact, are extra targeted on addressing energy asymmetries in international well being analysis and schooling, and finally follow.
We recognise that HIC versus LMIC, North versus South, and coloniser versus colonised are crude dichotomies that obscure greater than they reveal. Therefore, we listen on this article to the truth that each grouping has its personal inside energy hierarchies (as displayed within the Fig 1), with intersectional systemic disadvantages triggered, amongst others, by race, caste, class, ethnicity, gender, and faith. Coloniality is however one manifestation of supremacy. Subsequently, undoing supremacy would require far more than decolonisation .
“Decolonising ourselves”: What change can we wish to see amongst ourselves as people?
Emancipate our minds
Many people must intentionally decolonise our minds. Essentially the most harmful locus of colonisation isn’t bodily, however our minds . Colonisation was designed to insidiously permeate each facet of our price judgement as people. As Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o noticed in his ebook Decolonising the Thoughts, “the colonial classroom grew to become a device of psychological conquest in Africa and past… and it made the conquest everlasting” . Many people are merchandise of such deliberate and persisting colonial schooling insurance policies, usually bolstered by the upper schooling many people have been privileged to obtain. It’s time to undo the colonial mentality of inferiority that many people had been raised to own.
To take action, we should construct deep and collective consciousness of how our colonial histories have formed our considering and proceed to affect our method of seeing and doing. We should make aware efforts to unlearn the concept of Western analysis and data programs, versus native analysis and conventional/indigenous data programs, as being the one approach to advance healthcare or impact change. We should continuously listen in our language (for instance, use of phrases comparable to “beneficiaries” or “Third world”) and in our each day lives and work, to reject the misguided urge to repair the lives or issues of people who find themselves oppressed or deprived—and as a substitute, use our voice and affect to redistribute energy in ways in which allow the legitimisation and acknowledgement that marginalised individuals are the specialists of their very own lives.
Our function as researchers and practitioners is to be allies and work in solidarity with marginalised individuals within the technique of reaching the modifications that they search. Studying and working towards crucial allyship isn’t just for altering our personal behaviours, but in addition for basically shifting the programs that oppress individuals . Efficient allyship would require us to recognise the privileges, alternatives, assets, and energy now we have been accorded whereas others have been overtly or subtly denied them.
Additional, we should deliver our authenticity, our experiences, our background, our proximity to the work, and the number of influences that inform our concepts into the areas by which we have interaction—turning into energy issues which have historically been used to make us really feel like imposters, e.g., being a girl, or an individual of color, or a neighborhood, being domestically skilled, or not having English as a primary language . We should refocus our consideration to the native gaze, to native wants, priorities, communities, and decision-makers, in order that we’re extra conscious of these than to exterior “Requests for Proposals” in our alternative of focus. Lastly, we should study from Black, Indigenous, and feminist actions find out how to shift away from the coloniser’s mannequin of the world, and to assist us unlearn, unthink, and undo the logics and doings of coloniality [9,24].
It’s an uphill battle to unthink and unlearn the dominant fashions that for many people have been simple shortcuts for making sense of the world and making progress in our personal schooling (e.g., a few of us earned increased levels within the international North) and careers (e.g., a few of us now work in HICs and in privileged LMIC establishments). These actions require that we’re accountable to and help each other as we search to see the world and our place in it anew.
Straddle privilege responsibly
Reimagining international well being within the post-COVID-19 world requires that we handle the intersecting programs of supremacy that proceed to restrict our capability to attain fairness and justice. Inequities are usually not solely in regards to the wants and considerations of the deprived, but in addition the programs that create disadvantages. Privilege is advanced and relational,  as displayed in Fig 1. The social constructions that create disadvantages are the identical ones that create the benefits from which many people—together with among the authors of this text—profit.
To keep away from elite seize, we should continuously mirror on our personal positionality, behaviour, and unconscious biases, in an ongoing slightly than one-off course of; lest within the pursuit of fairness and justice, we find yourself perpetuating colonial malpractice. We should be intentional across the advanced negotiation that we undertake every single day between the completely different positionalities that we maintain. As Senait Fisseha famous, “We’re all a part of a damaged system. Doing good work within the discipline requires … taking a crucial eye to 1’s personal identification and the way one has benefited from a system that oppresses so many others .” We’d like to have the ability to recognise after we are a part of creating the issue and when our selections and actions serve or allow, slightly than problem the established order that perpetuates othering and dehumanisation.
Dismantling oppressive energy requires a couple of group of individuals demanding change. Undoing marginalisation requires greater than the marginalised talking up. Many marginalised teams (to which among the authors of this paper belong)—e.g., Black, Indigenous, and folks of color (BIPOC), intercourse employees, migrants and refugees, girls and women, ethnic minorities, individuals with disabilities, and lesbian, homosexual, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and questioning (LGBTIQ) individuals—are systematically denied platforms for political, social, and cultural causes. However researchers, coverage makers, implementers who present solidarity (politically, financially, and emotionally) should permit the marginalised to find out the situations of engagement of their areas, recognising, as we straddle areas, that we should act responsibly and that marginalised individuals are the specialists of their very own lives.
These of us with bigger audiences and areas of affect ought to disrupt, name out, or shift away from neocolonial practices after we see them in ourselves and in others, together with these, who, like us, are working to decolonise international well being. Males, particularly, must “lean out” and create house for girls . This requires braveness, and it could be pricey or uncomfortable to take action. In enjoying these roles, we should be relentless in working towards reflexivity, submit ourselves to fixed problem, and encompass ourselves with individuals who will demand accountability of us, with a slight nudge or sort reminder after we go astray in direction of (re-)enacting colonial attitudes and practices.
Construct “Southern” networks
These of us who’ve a loud voice in international well being ought to collectively affirm our possession of the sphere, declare the house in international well being that belongs to us and is proportional to the dimensions of our populations, data, and issues, weave networks of solidarity with friends (e.g., Rising Voices in International Well being  and Girls in International Well being with a number of nation chapters ), convert the alternatives we obtain into alternatives we give, and construct collaborations throughout the worldwide South, with out essentially lowering “North–South” partnerships. In lots of international South settings (e.g., in Africa), universities and analysis institutes usually tend to have international North than in-country or in-continent collaborators, that are important for solidarity and studying throughout settings. Even inside southern networks, there’s a want to have interaction girls, frontline employees, and folks with lived expertise since they’re usually invisible in nationwide consultations and committees .
Claiming house requires confidence. It requires that we imagine that “we will,” and we already maintain and have the capability to supply data. Nevertheless, our confidence within the potential of our concepts and actions is weakened by the burden of asymmetry that comes with being on the receiving finish of (typically beneficial) help, data, and interventions. Usually, we simply assume we aren’t adequate or skilled sufficient and somebody with extra expertise, in a “higher” institute within the international North will do one thing higher, with out contemplating the migration of abilities from the worldwide South. Typically, that perception is foisted on us by colleagues in or funding from the worldwide North. The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the significance of LMIC scientists in producing and utilizing data domestically [30,31]. This has proven us that “we will”—now we have had no alternative however to get on with it (as our “collaborators” had been busy with their very own response or needed to return residence shortly), thus boosting confidence that “we will” .
However with out our governments transferring in direction of self-sufficiency, wanting inside to maximise the usage of native data and capability, such bursts of confidence might be quick lived. Transferring from the receiving finish of interventions into funding, designing, and implementing native options requires native assets and alliances (e.g., by way of international South networks)—for which we should maintain our governments to account [32,33].
To shift the centre of gravity of information manufacturing and use, we’d like home funding alternatives and native platforms for data manufacturing and use (e.g., tutorial institutes and journals) that take Indigenous data, native wants, and languages into consideration, particularly as a result of present platforms are sometimes inaccessible (in English, pricey, elitist, and distant) . For instance, the current bulletins by Springer Nature and Elsevier about excessive article processing prices is an instance of how elitist, unique, and exclusionary status journals could be .
Nevertheless, we should maintain ourselves accountable to keep away from elite seize. There’s restricted worth in constructing new networks and platforms within the international South if they’re captured by the native elite like us, such that issues stay colonial, and the wants of the centre and the privileged stay prioritised over the periphery and fewer privileged in policymaking and implementation.
“Decolonising organisations”: What change can we wish to see in international well being organisations?
Actual variety and inclusion
At present, international well being is neither international nor numerous [4,35]. It’s due to this fact not stunning to see rising variety of stories of systemic racism, White supremacy, and discrimination in lots of organisations . Primarily headquartered in HICs (85% in North America, Europe, and Oceania) the place main choices are made, knowledge present that 70% of leaders (CEOs or Board Chairs) in a pattern of practically 200 international well being organisations are males, greater than 80% are nationals of HICs, and greater than 90% had been educated in HICs .
International well being journals lack variety , and analysis publications and commissions targeted on LMICs are dominated by authors from HICs, who usually take the lead and/or senior authorship . The Lancet commissions, for instance, are dominated by HIC specialists, and a overwhelming majority have secretariats based mostly in HIC universities . Awards in international well being are largely given to males and specialists from HICs .
Briefly, most international well being organisations are run out of HICs, largely by males, and with workers dominated by individuals (largely White) from HICs. And HICs account for a majority of world well being spending, and by advantage of controlling the purse strings, they successfully management the worldwide well being agenda . If addressing inequities is a central aim of world well being, ought to we proceed to entrust that aim to elite HIC establishments who may not mirror the individuals being served?
All international well being organisations (within the international North or international South) should decide to actual variety, fairness, and inclusion (DEI) as a part of their core mission and make sure that their management and workers are numerous and gender balanced with out which international well being organisations are certain to fail of their mission. Even essentially the most well-intentioned individuals who declare to not have racist or supremacist biases behave in ways in which undermine the experience and data of (different) native researchers, practitioners, communities, and people. Organisations (e.g., universities, bilateral and multilateral businesses, nongovernmental organisations [NGOs], philanthropic organisations, and so on.) are inclined to scapegoat particular person workers members when problems with bias come up (e.g., bullying and withholding alternatives). However they should be held accountable for constructions and processes that forestall any type of discrimination by workers—e.g., coaching for employees, an in depth motion plan, and mandates on how the organisation will stand by marginalised communities and find out how to advocate for his or her rights.
It’s simple to ask individuals from marginalised teams to affix advisory boards or so as to add African- and Asian-sounding names as coauthors on analysis articles to please journal editors and peer reviewers. Past that, international well being organisations should be held accountable for governance constructions and processes that embody native companions, and people who find themselves usually underrepresented, in ways in which transcend the beauty. For instance, stories from communities and native companions could also be included in workers efficiency analysis. Funding businesses in HICs should be sure they immediately fund LMIC organisations which are addressing their very own native analysis priorities. International well being packages in HICs should guarantee reciprocity and host trainees and specialists from LMICs .
These processes of accountability should be applied in a context that takes the transformation, liberation, and decolonial agenda significantly . If not, these interventions will develop into Band-Aids, slightly than structural shifts that distribute energy and assets. As Themrise Khan warns us, decolonisation is now changing into a “snug buzzword for these within the North, pushed by the necessity to not quit energy and stay related” . The International South, she emphasises, should finish inequality by itself phrases—not the North’s.
International well being follow wants a brand new politics of accountability. Shifting the geography of information from “overseas experience” to native and Indigenous data holders is a part of this new politics . Shifting international well being management from White-led, White-dominated HIC establishments to BIPOC-led, BIPOC-dominated LMIC establishments can also be crucial . Drawing on intersectional Black, girl and feminist actions, and Indigenous data programs can facilitate new management and organisational practices and theories and processes that centre our humanity by way of values of radical love, care, compassion, and the redistribution of assets and energy.
Localising funding choices
A lot too usually, worldwide donors and funding organisations who come as “saviours,” favor to fund initiatives that handle their very own pursuits, on their very own phrases. This, in flip, results in a waste of assets, lack of native analysis curiosity, and lack of belief between grantees and donors.
Even when analysis or implementation work is targeted completely on LMICs, a lot of donor funds are given to businesses and establishments in HICs, and HICs maintain the purse strings . For instance, lower than 2% of all humanitarian funding goes on to native NGOs . About 80% of USAID’s contracts and grants go on to United States companies . Furthermore, 70% of NIH Fogarty grants go to US and HIC establishments , and 73% of the whole worldwide grant portfolio of the Wellcome Belief helps United Kingdom–based mostly exercise . Even with funds are given to LMIC businesses, HIC donors usually set the agenda and micromanage the work, leaving little room for LMIC teams to innovate.
Funders should be held accountable for creating constructions and processes for participating with grantees, for letting grantees information them on the significance of assorted initiatives, and for opening the doorways of decision-making to individuals on the margins, who maintain the important thing to driving change and are closest to the work—i.e., transferring away from parachute analysis and initiatives in direction of centring native data and natural processes. LMIC establishments and researchers want to talk out extra towards parachute analysis and demand higher management of funding and analysis output (e.g., publications). In addition they want to make sure that reciprocity and bidirectional partnership is included in grant agreements and memoranda of understanding.
With quick funding cycles, and the everyday insistence on “fast wins” and “low hanging fruits” from many funders, international well being initiatives are usually “surgical” versus “natural” of their method, leading to superficial and short-lived initiatives that fail to sufficiently take the native context into consideration or have basic and sustained impression . The hazard of those “fast wins,” which include their very own agenda, accountability processes, and wishes, is that they’ll shift native organisations’ processes away from their core aim.
Funders and donors should be held accountable for constructing actual, long-term, mutually useful, and reciprocal collaborations, with individuals on the bottom within the driving seat, and a clearly outlined shift in decision-making energy on what’s to be funded to native companions.
The persisting legacy of short-term funding is that it reproduces inequalities in native well being programs within the type of vertical programming. The attract of the “surgical” can also be there in how nationwide governments within the international South shift in tandem to extra tangible issues slightly than those who require natural processes to sort out. It’s seen in how the roles, promotions, and fundability of teachers within the international North (and more and more within the international South) are based mostly on tangible measures comparable to publications in high-impact journals and profitable analysis grants, with a lot much less (if any) give attention to the ethics and (epistemic) justice implications of the work, the usage of native data, capability constructing, or implementation.
A lot of world well being is carried out by way of universities and related entities. It’s a main drawback that teachers within the international North (and more and more within the international South) are incentivised to focus totally on private improvement (e.g., tenure, awards, publications, and grants), usually on the expense of actual impression . Universities and tutorial institutes concerned in international well being should be held accountable for creating constructions and processes that incentivise teachers to be higher allies (e.g., give credit score to HIC and different privileged LMIC colleagues for his or her supportive, allyship work) and be conscious of decision-makers on the bottom, have interaction with natural native processes and Indigenous data, and interact with native companions as leaders of the method of information manufacturing and use.
LMIC governments and establishments should make investments extra in their very own healthcare supply, analysis, and coaching, with a purpose to cut back their dependence on HIC donors, universities, and philanthropies. Constructing high quality analysis and educating establishments in LMICs is crucial, to scale back reliance on HICs and to enhance the general high quality, depth, and relevance of scientific coaching and analysis .
We can not reform international well being with out interrogating the very concept of world well being itself, its underlying values, and even its vocabulary [1,2]. We have to perceive the methods by which the colonial legacies deeply entrenched in nationwide and international well being programs impede the achievement of well being fairness.
The present international well being panorama is closely centralised and homogenous. International well being stays a lot too centred on people and businesses in HICs. Most “famend” international well being leaders are White, able-bodied males with a level from an elite Western college, who lead organisations headquartered within the international North with floor operations ruled from a distance . A consultant heterogeneous management and a decentralised mode of governance and operation are lengthy overdue.
We’d ideally hope that these at present international North centres of world well being energy will reply to our calls to decolonise international well being by shifting energy to individuals on the margins and the periphery .
However we can not depend on this to occur by itself with no sustained push or demand. As Lioba Hirsch wrote, to be taken significantly, any dedication from international well being establishments to undoing colonialism and combating racism should be matched by demonstrated willingness “to surrender some or all of their energy” and “a radical redistribution of funding away from HICs, a lack of epistemic and political authority, and a limitation to [their] energy to intervene in LMICs” .
It’s by no means simple for HIC organisations or some other privileged group or particular person to surrender their energy. We’d like commitments from international well being organisations to which they are often held accountable. These organisations (e.g., universities and different tutorial institutes, philanthropic organisations, humanitarian organisations, and the educational publishing business that publish in fields associated to international well being) must recognise the implications of being centralised and homogenous entities and take clear steps to develop into numerous and decentralised.
Specifically, and for instance, universities and different institutes concerned in international well being analysis and coaching should be held accountable for creating extra alternatives for international well being schooling and coaching that are designed, carried out, and imparted domestically and are conscious of native contexts [49,50]. These institutes, particularly faculties of world public well being, must decide to being held accountable for perpetuating colonial and exploitative practices—e.g., within the type of Masters in International Well being packages that are so costly that they’re apparently not designed for individuals in LMICs or with out privilege and for analysis coaching programmes which are designed primarily for college students within the international North .
The worldwide well being classroom is now the world, and international well being programs in HICs can use the digital format to amplify voices from the International South, Indigenous students, and BIPOC people with lived expertise of oppression and resilience . Distant educating can be utilized to achieve wider and numerous audiences, together with teams that is probably not enrolled in conventional diploma packages .
Universities and tutorial institutes within the international North must decide to decentralising their international well being operations, by transferring and spreading their present international North base to completely different areas throughout the worldwide South, with possession subsequently transferred too. They could fold their operations into international public well being schooling and coaching institutes within the international South or increase their field-based college in order that LMIC scientists can keep at residence and work domestically—association made a lot simpler because of distant studying pushed by COVID-19 . Their operations within the international North might develop into minor and even stop to exist, thus serving to to shift the centre of world well being to the periphery. Nevertheless, in doing so, they have to keep away from recreating themselves, however as a substitute allow various entities that talk to native circumstances in numerous elements of the world.
Reimagining international well being
The COVID-19 pandemic has been devastating for all the world, with greater than 125 million individuals affected and over 2.7 million useless as of March 2021. However the pandemic has additionally had a wider impression on all different areas of well being, care, and international well being. Years of progress in lots of areas of world well being (e.g., immunisation, tuberculosis [TB], AIDS, and malaria) have been erased in a span of 1 yr . To make issues worse, the world is at the moment within the deepest international recession because the Second World Battle. As hundreds of thousands are pushed into poverty, well being outcomes can solely worsen. And, we nonetheless have the local weather disaster looming in our quick future.
As the present financial inequities worsen, and the privileged develop into extra privileged, our collective capability to take care of these cumulative threats might be enormously diminished . Certainly, the COVID-19 pandemic is a watershed second in historical past. Are we going to proceed the identical path of widening inequities, the place a small variety of individuals personal as a lot wealth as half the world’s inhabitants ?
Can international well being be equitable when the world itself isn’t? The COVID-19 pandemic requires a extra equitable world and a brand new method to international well being analysis, schooling, and follow . It requires a decolonised and decentralised international well being, one which strikes past tokenistic field ticking about variety and inclusion into creating new constructions and processes that may handle energy asymmetries.
The decolonising international well being discourse is producing lots of curiosity, however we’re simply seeing the tip of the iceberg. Championed by predominantly younger, BIPOC college students, the discourse is difficult the established order—and the skewed methods by which international well being is being studied, taught, funded, researched, pushed, designed, and applied. We recognise that the accountability and reshaping of energy dynamics are on the coronary heart of all our proposals for change by ourselves and by organisations. These are usually not simple, even for individuals and organisations which are avowedly effectively intentioned and fairness targeted. However good intentions are usually not sufficient.
We’re conscious that the worldwide well being of our desires and our want record are unrecognisable from the worldwide well being of at present. A lot must change. However change is feasible—if we’re all prepared to deepen our consciousness, hear deeply, hear in another way, embrace international solidarity, and struggle supremacy in all its types. We’re optimistic and hopeful that these desires will develop into actuality, because the COVID-19 disaster has made it crucial that humanity builds a extra simply and equitable world . Preventing for such a world, throughout and after the pandemic, needs to be synonymous with international well being follow.
Disclaimers: Kenneth Munge declares that the views expressed on this paper are completely these of the writer. They don’t essentially signify the views of the Worldwide Financial institution for Reconstruction and Improvement/World Financial institution and its affiliated organisations or these of the Government Administrators of the World Financial institution or the governments they signify.
Abimbola S, Pai M. Will international well being survive its decolonisation? Lancet. 2020;396(10263):1627–8. pmid:33220735.
Abimbola S. On the that means of world well being and the function of world well being journals. Int Well being. 2018;10(2):63–5. pmid:29528402.
Abimbola S. The overseas gaze: authorship in tutorial international well being. BMJ Glob Well being. 2019;4(5):e002068. pmid:31750005; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6830280.
International Well being 50/50. The International Well being 50/50 Report 2020: Energy, Privilege and Priorities. London, UK; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://globalhealth5050.org/2020report/.
Buyum AM, Kenney C, Koris A, Mkumba L, Raveendran Y. Decolonising international well being: if not now, when? BMJ Glob Well being. 2020;5(8). Epub 2020 Aug 8. pmid:32759186; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7409954.
Jumbam DT. How (not) to jot down about international well being. BMJ Glob Well being. 2020;5(7). Epub 2020 Jul 22. pmid:32690483; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7371021.
Dalglish SL. COVID-19 provides the deceive international well being experience. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1189. Epub 2020 Mar 31. pmid:32222159; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7194526.
Louskieter L, Munshi S. International Well being continues to be the “Grasp’s Home”: how courageous are we to decolonise and dismantle it? 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.internationalhealthpolicies.org/featured-article/global-health-is-still-the-masters-house-how-brave-are-we-to-decolonise-and-dismantle-it/.
Louskieter L, Munshi S. Decolonial thought and African consciousness for socially simply well being programs: An imaginative house. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.internationalhealthpolicies.org/featured-article/decolonial-thought-and-african-consciousness-for-socially-just-health-systems-an-imaginative-space/.
Guinto R. #DecolonizeGlobalHealth: Rewriting the narrative of world well being. Accessible from: https://www.internationalhealthpolicies.org/blogs/decolonizeglobalhealth-rewriting-the-narrative-of-global-health/International Well being Policies2019.
Saha S, Kavattur P, Goheer A. The C-Phrase: Tackling the enduring legacy of colonialism in international well being. Well being Techniques International; 2019 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://healthsystemsglobal.org/news/the-c-word-tackling-the-enduring-legacy-of-colonialism-in-global-health/.
Kumar A. White Supremacy in International Well being. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/white-supremacy-global-health.
van Daalen KR, Bajnoczki C, Chowdhury M, Dada S, Khorsand P, Socha A, et al. Signs of a damaged system: the gender gaps in COVID-19 decision-making. BMJ Glob Well being. 2020;5(10). Epub 2020 Oct 3. pmid:33004348; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7533958.
Hirsch LA. Is it attainable to decolonise international well being establishments? Lancet. 2021;397(10270):189–90. Epub 2021 Jan 18. pmid:33453772.
Lal A, Erondu NA, Heymann DL, Gitahi G, Yates R. Fragmented well being programs in COVID-19: rectifying the misalignment between international well being safety and common well being protection. Lancet. 2020. Epub 2020 Dec 5. pmid:33275906.
Williams CR, Kestenbaum JG, Meier BM. Populist Nationalism Threatens Well being and Human Rights within the COVID-19 Response. Am J Public Well being. 2020;110(12):1766–8. Epub 2020 Oct 30. pmid:33119409; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7661975.
Twohey M, Collins Okay, Thomas Okay. With First Dibs on Vaccines, Wealthy Nations Have ‘Cleared the Cabinets’. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/15/us/coronavirus-vaccine-doses-reserved.html?smid=tw-share.
Razavi A, Erondu N, Okereke E. The International Well being Safety Index: what worth does it add? BMJ Glob Well being. 2020;5(4). Epub 2020 Might 1. pmid:32349994; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7213809.
Abimbola S, Pai M. Undoing supremacy in international well being would require greater than decolonisation—Authors’ reply. Lancet. 2021;397(10279):1058–9. Epub 2021 Mar 22. pmid:33743862.
Biko S. I write what I like: Chosen writings. HarperCollins; 1979.
Thiong’o Nw. Decolonising the Thoughts: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Heinemann Academic; 1986.
Nixon SA. The coin mannequin of privilege and demanding allyship: implications for well being. BMC Public Well being. 2019;19(1):1637. Epub 2019 Dec 7. pmid:31805907; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6896777.
EJS Centre. Rumbidzai Chisenga and Senait Fisseha focus on the challenges and alternatives for African girls’s management on the Girls Leaders in International Well being Convention 2020. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.ejscenter.org/news/rumbidzai-chisenga-and-senait-fisseha-discuss-the-challenges-and-opportunities-for-african-womens-leadership-at-the-women-leaders-in-global-health-conference-2020/.
Tuck E, Yang KW. Decolonization isn’t a metaphor. Decolonization Indigeneity Educ Soc. 2012;1:1–40.
Fisseha S. Disrupt and Restore: Addressing Energy Asymmetries in International Well being. International Well being Evening, McGill International Well being Applications. Montreal: McGill College; 2020. Accessible from: https://www.mcgill.ca/globalhealth/channels/event/global-health-night-2020-323678.
Pai M. Males in International Well being, Time To ’Lean Out’. Nature Microbiology Group (weblog). 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://naturemicrobiologycommunity.nature.com/posts/to-address-power-asymmetry-in-global-health-men-must-lean-out.
Srinivas PN, Henriksson DK V SG, Decoster Okay, Topp SM, Abimbola S, et al. “Collectively we transfer a mountain”: celebrating a decade of the Rising Voices for International Well being community. BMJ Glob Well being. 2020;5(7). Epub 2020 Jul 28. pmid:32709703; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7380710.
Girls in International Well being. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.womeningh.org/.
Girls in International Well being India. WGH India Dialogue Collection: Amplifying the engagement of Feminine Frontline Well being Staff in India’s COVID-19 Response. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.internationalhealthpolicies.org/featured-article/wgh-india-dialogue-series-amplifying-the-engagement-of-female-frontline-health-workers-in-indias-covid-19-response/.
Pilling D. How Africa fought the pandemic—and what coronavirus has taught the world. Monetary Occasions. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.ft.com/content/c0badd91-a395-4644-a734-316e71d60bf7.
Saha S, Pai M. Can COVID-19 improvements and programs assist low- and middle-income nations to re-imagine healthcare supply? Med. 2020. pmid:33686383
Reidpath D, Allotey P, signatories. Protect International South’s analysis capability. Science. 2020;368(6492):725. Epub 2020 Might 16. pmid:32409468.
Reidpath DD, Allotey P. The issue of ’trickle-down science’ from the International North to the International South. BMJ Glob Well being. 2019;4(4):e001719. pmid:31406597; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6666820.
Pai M. How Status Journals Stay Elite, Unique And Exclusionary. Forbes. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 26]. Accessible from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/madhukarpai/2020/11/30/how-prestige-journals-remain-elite-exclusive-and-exclusionary/?sh=615d4e3e4d48.
Pai M. International Well being Wants To Be International & Numerous. USA: Forbes; 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 26]. Accessible from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/madhukarpai/2020/03/08/global-health-needs-to-be-global—diverse/#502c7d976590.
Nafade V, Sen P, Pai M. International well being journals want to deal with fairness, variety and inclusion. BMJ Glob Well being. 2019;4(5):e002018. pmid:31750004; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6830051.
Hedt-Gauthier BL, Jeufack HM, Neufeld NH, Alem A, Sauer S, Odhiambo J, et al. Caught within the center: a scientific evaluation of authorship in collaborative well being analysis in Africa, 2014–2016. BMJ Glob Well being. 2019;4(5):e001853. pmid:31750000; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6830050.
Hetzel MW, Bonfoh B. In direction of extra balanced illustration in Lancet Commissions. Lancet. 2020;395(10238):1693–4. Epub 2020 Jun 1. pmid:32473672; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7255749.
MacLean E, Bigio J, Singh U, Klinton J, Pai M. International tuberculosis awards should do higher with fairness, variety, and inclusion. 2021;397(10270):192–23.
Dieleman JL, Micah AE, Murray CJL. International Well being Spending and Improvement Help for Well being. JAMA. 2019;321(21):2073–4. Epub 2019 Apr 26. pmid:31021368.
Pai M. Reciprocity In International Well being: Right here Is How We Can Do Higher. USA: Forbes; 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 26]. Accessible from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/madhukarpai/2020/03/06/reciprocity-in-global-health-here-is-how-we-can-do-better/#4a9da6e677a9.
Khan MS, Abimbola S, Aloudat T, Capobianco E, Hawkes S, Rahman-Shepherd A. Decolonising international well being in 2021: a roadmap to maneuver from rhetoric to reform. BMJ Glob Well being. 2021;6:e005604. pmid:33758016
Khan T. Decolonisation is a snug buzzword for the help sector. openDemoracy [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2020 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/decolonisation-comfortable-buzzword-aid-sector/.
van der Zee B. Lower than 2% of humanitarian funds ’go on to native NGOs’. 2015 [cited 2020 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2015/oct/16/less-than-2-of-humanitarian-funds-go-directly-to-local-ngos.
Malik Okay. As a system, overseas help is a fraud and does nothing for inequality. 2018 [cited 2020 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/02/as-a-system-foreign-aid-is-a-fraud-and-does-nothing-for-inequality.
Glass R. Decolonizing and democratizing international well being are troublesome, however very important objectives. 2020 [cited 2020 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.fic.nih.gov/News/GlobalHealthMatters/july-august-2020/Pages/roger-glass-decolonizing-global-health.aspx.
Wellcome Belief. Grant funding knowledge report 2018/19. 2020 [cited 2020 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/grant-funding-data-2018-2019.pdf.
Pai M. International Well being Analysis Wants Extra Than A Makeover. USA: Forbes; 2019 [cited 2019 Jun 26]. Accessible from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/madhukarpai/2019/11/10/global-health-research-needs-more-than-a-makeover/#3c21ddcf7e34.
Montenegro CR, Bernales M, Gonzalez-Aguero M. Instructing international well being from the south: challenges and proposals. Crit Public Well being. 2020;30:127–9.
Erondu NA, Peprah D, Khan MS. Can faculties of world public well being dismantle colonial legacies? Nat Med. 2020;26(10):1504–5. Epub 2020 Aug 30. pmid:32860007.
Svadzian A, Vasquez NA, Abimbola S, Pai M. International well being levels: at what value? BMJ Glob Well being. 2020;5(8). Epub 2020 Aug 8. pmid:32759185; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7410003.
Atkins S, Banerjee AT, Bachynski Okay, Daftary A, Desai G, Gross A, et al. Utilizing the COVID-19 Disaster To Reimagine International Well being Instructing in Excessive-Earnings Nations. BMJ Glob Well being. 2021:e005649.
Invoice and Melinda Gates Basis. 2020 Goalkeepers Report. Covid-19: a worldwide perspective. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/goalkeepers/report/2020-report/#GlobalPerspective.
Marmot M, Allen J, Goldblatt P, Morrison J. Michael Marmot: Publish covid-19, we should construct again fairer. BMJ Opinion. 2020. Accessible from: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/12/15/michael-marmot-post-covid-19-we-must-build-back-fairer/.
Oxfam. World’s billionaires have extra wealth than 4.6 billion individuals. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 13]. Accessible from: https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/worlds-billionaires-have-more-wealth-46-billion-people.